Home Invasion and Murder in upscale Neighborhood outside Philadelphia


Swartley Road neighborhood in Hilltown TownshipHilltown home invasion


1) Here is a Philadelphia news report about a home robbery/murder occurring about 35 miles outside the
city.   Some interesting points:
a) Home is in an upscale, low crime suburban area.   Large Home is on 10 acres of land and worth roughly $900,000.
b) Killers were in home for several hours –tied up victim’s girlfriend and 12 year old son.
c) Victim , however, was a businessman who filed bankruptcy to evade $1.8 Million in debts.
Don Williams
Hi Don, thanks the link.
This is another good example of the difference between wishful thinking and how events turn out in the real world.
Three big points here people:
1)We’ve said it time and again here in the blog: Seclusion and isolation doesn’t equal security. If anything, criminals have to worry about less eyes on them, there’s a smaller chance of someone noticing them and calling the police and they have all the time in the world to do what they want with their victims. You know why all these survival retreats have worked so well so far in terms of security? Because there still isn’t a serious crime problem in America!
2)They entered through a window. Notice how vulnerable most homes are. The window was probably opened, they just stepped inside through it. How many of you lock your front door but keep the back door opened? Doors and windows should be locked, and you should keep an eye on them when opening them for ventilation and fresh air. The reality is that most people don’t have barred windows and armored doors, and that means most people are pretty vulnerable in their homes.
3)The home owner had guns. Still, guns are a last line of defense, they are not an alarm, they don’t replace locked doors and windows and competent home security habits. Maybe if the window had been crashed to enter and the home owner had reacted fast enough or if he had been carrying his gun, he would have had a chance to defend himself. If you can carry in your State, serious gun owners carry at all times, when on the street or their living room. Especially if your home isn’t hardened for security, your reaction time gap is measured in the seconds it takes to shatter a sliding glass door with the butt or slide of the handgun and stepping inside. It’s a matter of few seconds, not few minutes.

Survival in a Condominium?


Hi Ferfal,
I bought your book and then decided not to buy a home as a backup plan that was about 9 miles outside of Tehachapi, California, USA and 1 mile from the nearest neighbor.
I could consider a home in a gated community, in the town of Tehachapi.  The town has a hospital, about 13,000 people and is 40 miles from a town of 350,000 people.
But, I am starting to wonder how much different it would be from where I am now.  I live in Los Angeles now on the second floor of 3-story condominium building.  I thought about how you said order is restored first in the city and that’s where the food and work are.  I would of course, get food, safes, gun, secure door, windows, security cam., etc.  Any thoughts?
Also, do you know how condominiums fared after the collapse?  I am worried about others not being able to pay their dues.
Thanks again,
Hi Tim, from a purely practical point of view, if you’re in a good condo on a somewhat safe neighborhood, and you add an alarm and a good security door, your home will be pretty safe. A condo can be safer and easier to secure than a place in the suburbs or an isolated home in the sticks. If you have security in your building even more so, it will be pretty safe in comparison to anything other than a closed gated community with good security. While you do want to avoid the big mayor cities like LA and New York, generally speaking, living outside a city isn’t that much about a practical choice, but more about quality of life regarding having more room and open green spaces, grass for the kids to play and such.
As you correctly note, resources both during disasters and financial crisis are generally focused on major population areas where it benefits the most people. Granted, not the best place to be during a flu pandemic, war (where your location may be close to a strategic target, or be one itself!) or an earthquake, but in general the benefits are greater than the disadvantages from a purely practical perspective. Then again, most of us just don’t like living in big cities, and life’s just too short for not doing what we like. As said before, I find that living in the suburbs of a medium size town or small city presents the best compromise.
For some time I found myself living in a condo in Buenos Aires. In spite of the huge crime problems in the city and the fact that I didn’t like living in it, I must admit it was the safest place I had been in while living in Argentina. There was a bank on the ground floor and a cop posted right in front of our door all day long. The windows that I had were secured with sturdy burglar bars, and I had the door replaced with a security armored one that locked on all 4 sides of the steel frame. Walls were brick and mortar construction.
One of the biggest problems in a condo is the lack of space for storage and also the issue of waste disposal if the waste collection service stops or becomes inefficient. As you note, your neighbors can be a problem as well. While some can be an asset, others may be slackers or downright criminals. You just never know who’s moving into the building next. A nicer middle class or higher end type of building does help, but keep in mind that even those can deteriorate along with the rest of society.
 Your planning should also include a bug out location outside the city you already reside in, and its not a bad idea to pre-position some of your supplies there.
Other tan that, don’t beat yourself too much about it!

Improving your Home Security Part II


Improving your Home Security


Housing after the Collapse: Country vs. Urban


Thanks so much for your wonderful blog.  I’ve seen a lot written about the pros / cons of debt going into an economic collapse.  You’re recent blog post about contracting brought up this topic.

We’re in the opposite position however,  I’d like your thoughts on the dangers of being debt free during/after a collapse because I see risks with this decision as well.  We own two houses with no debt or mortgage.  One is a large nice home near downtown Houston in a walled gated community, not in the suburbs; we use this house part-time.  The other is a small place with 15 acres just outside the city which is our full time home.

We think the US is headed for a dollar collapse.  We are considering selling the house in the city because much of our savings is in this home.  If we sold now, we could invest this money in precious metals.  However, we’d take a significant loss on the home.  So do we hold or sell?

Reasons to sell:

If we hold the home, we’re concerned about being able to pay property tax and insurance during a collapse

We’re concerned about rioting and crime in the city during/after a collapse, further driving down the value of this property

Finding buyers may become very difficult after the collapse

Reasons to keep the property

We could use it as a rental property for income.  (However, I’m concerned about the downward pressure on rents during a collapse b/c people will be so focused on having enough money to pay for food.)

If people migrate from the suburbs to the city b/c transportation costs skyrocket, it might be a good investment

We really like this house and enjoy the property

Your thoughts on this would be much appreciated.  If you post on your blog, please keep me anonymous.




Hi K, I think that right now isn’t the best time to sell given the overall low prices. I also believe you can profit nicely when renting it because of the reasons I’ll explain.

Regarding your two properties, they represent opposing views in terms of what works or not in a post-collapse society. Fiction survival literature would have you believe that a house in a rural setting is the best option. Stay as far from rioting cities as you can, avoid criminals by living far away. This is repeated over and over until people take it for a fact, but ironically the truth is that living in such conditions is possible only in very safe, functioning societies. The further away and more isolated you are, the more vulnerable you are. With higher gas prices commuting back and forth or driving into town puts a dent into your finances. As the system and infrastructure starts failing, roads, reliable power and proper medical care becomes unreliable the further away you are.

After a decade of studying different crisis and disaster scenarios in different countries all over the world I believe that the idea of retreating to rural areas as a way of rationally preparing for hard times has no foundation on empirical facts but is instead rooted on American survival fantasy concepts. In what seems to be a vicious circle, people keep regurgitating what others have said and take it for a fact rather than checking how things actually turn out when serious social crisis have occurred. You only have to study South Africa’s recent history, most third world countries or the post communism western union nations to understand that what is taken as a fact in the American survival culture isn’t quite so. Keeping it short, if you live well today in an isolated homestead without 24hs security, its precisely because society has not collapsed. You wont be able to do so afterwards.

Because of this, a house in a walled gated community is highly desirable and it will be even more so after a serious crisis or collapse. In most Latin American countries, gated communities such as those are the only way in which you can live with a degree of peace of mind while you sleep. Your two properties are basically giving you those two options.

As crime gets worse in USA, demand for such properties will go up. With a gated community you have options such as all neighbors paying more so as to have added security.

I wouldn’t sell it. If you like the other place more then I´d just rent it so as to make some money, always good to have another source of income, and at the same time you keep it as a plan B in case things go South Africa or Latinamerica way and you have to move into the gated community yourself.


Security: Are Small Dogs OK?

1 comment
File:BostonTerrierBrindleStand w.jpg

Boston Terrier



I’ve noticed in a number of your posts that you recommend getting guard dogs to help with protection.  It goes without saying that a guard dog must be big, intimidating, and well disciplined, but the question I have for you is about watch dogs.  What do you think about smaller dogs used to alert you when something is wrong?  I own a Boston Terrier, and she has incredible hearing and instincts.  Whenever anything is wrong, she will alert me to it.  Even if she isn’t in the same room, she uses a very distinct bark/snarl that only means one thing: someone is around, and I am not aware of it yet. She will usually get my attention well before the person is even on the front porch. She’s the same way at night too.  While she wouldn’t be able to defend the home or the family, she allows plenty of time to get my side-arm ready (9MM with Gold dot +P) before checking things out.  I always sleep better knowing that it is highly unlikely I will be surprised by an intruder.

The reason I bring up the watch dog is because some people might not have enough land/time/resources to deal with a bigger guard dog.

So what do you think?

I really enjoy the blog.  Thanks for all the great info!


At one point in life I was living in a house with a big yard and had a Jack Russell Terrier as our family dog. My next door neighbor had just moved in and he had this huge Rottweiler. He would walk the dog puffing out his chest, bursting with pride. He apparently didn’t notice that his dog barked at everything and anything, from butterflies, to cars passing by, and also to us, the neighbors, that constantly walked by everyday, basically making it impossible to know if the dog was barking because of a real threat or not. One day after the usual “hi” we talked a bit more and of course he just had to talk about his pride and joy, how it would destroy any intruder and how mine was only good for barking and warning. I told him I was fine with that because I only needed the dog to let me know someone was inside, the killing him part would be my job. He didn’t talk to me much after that. Some people are weird that way. Its ok for them to have their dogs attack an intruder but they find it offensive to shot a bad guy themselves.

Indeed, as you describe, some dogs are just great for that. Many years ago I had a  Pekinese with some Dachshund blood in it. That dog was one of the best “alarms” I ever had. It would know from the sound of the engine alone if the car approaching was ours or not and start barking before it even parked.  Great hearing and light sleeper too. The Jack Russell is also a nice compact animal, courageous little fella, but pretty stubborn of character and not for someone that is inexperienced.

As you say, sometimes you just don’t have the space, the time or desire to deal with a bigger dog, and a smaller dog can warn you in advance. In fact, many criminals don’t like to deal with dogs no matter how small they are, for them its an extra problem to deal with. During hard economic times, a smaller dog will be easier on your budget too, requiring less food. They take up less space and can be carried easier if you have to leave in a hurry.

Spike with a bone

The dog that I have now, an English Bull Terrier, it’s a nice compromise between small and medium size dog, yet very strong and to a point intimidating to some people. “Is he good?” or “Does he bite?” seem to be the most common remarks I get and I noticed that people will usually keep their distance when I´m walking it. On the other hand this English Bull Terrier fan basically jumped out of his car and ran towards me when I was walking Spike, he went to the ground and started petting my dog. He was just a few months old back then and this guy obviously liked these kind of dogs a lot.

Big dogs are great, but they take up space and resources and can be problematic to a point, so they are not for everyone. A small dog that warns you in advance, barks and makes bad guys think twice about breaking in? Absolutely, it’s a great idea to have one in the house.

Join the forum discussion on this post!


« Previous Entries